254 research outputs found

    Covering complete partite hypergraphs by monochromatic components

    Get PDF
    A well-known special case of a conjecture attributed to Ryser states that k-partite intersecting hypergraphs have transversals of at most k-1 vertices. An equivalent form was formulated by Gy\'arf\'as: if the edges of a complete graph K are colored with k colors then the vertex set of K can be covered by at most k-1 sets, each connected in some color. It turned out that the analogue of the conjecture for hypergraphs can be answered: Z. Kir\'aly proved that in every k-coloring of the edges of the r-uniform complete hypergraph K^r (r >= 3), the vertex set of K^r can be covered by at most ⌈k/r⌉\lceil k/r \rceil sets, each connected in some color. Here we investigate the analogue problem for complete r-uniform r-partite hypergraphs. An edge coloring of a hypergraph is called spanning if every vertex is incident to edges of any color used in the coloring. We propose the following analogue of Ryser conjecture. In every spanning (r+t)-coloring of the edges of a complete r-uniform r-partite hypergraph, the vertex set can be covered by at most t+1 sets, each connected in some color. Our main result is that the conjecture is true for 1 <= t <= r-1. We also prove a slightly weaker result for t >= r, namely that t+2 sets, each connected in some color, are enough to cover the vertex set. To build a bridge between complete r-uniform and complete r-uniform r-partite hypergraphs, we introduce a new notion. A hypergraph is complete r-uniform (r,l)-partite if it has all r-sets that intersect each partite class in at most l vertices. Extending our results achieved for l=1, we prove that for any r >= 3, 2 <= l = 1+r-l, in every spanning k-coloring of the edges of a complete r-uniform (r,l)-partite hypergraph, the vertex set can be covered by at most 1+\lfloor \frac{k-r+\ell-1}{\ell}\rfloor sets, each connected in some color.Comment: 14 page

    On the tractability of some natural packing, covering and partitioning problems

    Get PDF
    In this paper we fix 7 types of undirected graphs: paths, paths with prescribed endvertices, circuits, forests, spanning trees, (not necessarily spanning) trees and cuts. Given an undirected graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) and two "object types" A\mathrm{A} and B\mathrm{B} chosen from the alternatives above, we consider the following questions. \textbf{Packing problem:} can we find an object of type A\mathrm{A} and one of type B\mathrm{B} in the edge set EE of GG, so that they are edge-disjoint? \textbf{Partitioning problem:} can we partition EE into an object of type A\mathrm{A} and one of type B\mathrm{B}? \textbf{Covering problem:} can we cover EE with an object of type A\mathrm{A}, and an object of type B\mathrm{B}? This framework includes 44 natural graph theoretic questions. Some of these problems were well-known before, for example covering the edge-set of a graph with two spanning trees, or finding an ss-tt path PP and an s′s'-t′t' path P′P' that are edge-disjoint. However, many others were not, for example can we find an ss-tt path P⊆EP\subseteq E and a spanning tree T⊆ET\subseteq E that are edge-disjoint? Most of these previously unknown problems turned out to be NP-complete, many of them even in planar graphs. This paper determines the status of these 44 problems. For the NP-complete problems we also investigate the planar version, for the polynomial problems we consider the matroidal generalization (wherever this makes sense)

    Problems and results on 1-cross intersecting set pair systems

    Full text link
    The notion of cross intersecting set pair system of size mm, ({Ai}i=1m,{Bi}i=1m)\Big(\{A_i\}_{i=1}^m, \{B_i\}_{i=1}^m\Big) with Ai∩Bi=∅A_i\cap B_i=\emptyset and Ai∩Bj≠∅A_i\cap B_j\ne\emptyset, was introduced by Bollob\'as and it became an important tool of extremal combinatorics. His classical result states that m≤(a+ba)m\le {a+b\choose a} if ∣Ai∣≤a|A_i|\le a and ∣Bi∣≤b|B_i|\le b for each ii. Our central problem is to see how this bound changes with the additional condition ∣Ai∩Bj∣=1|A_i\cap B_j|=1 for i≠ji\ne j. Such a system is called 11-cross intersecting. We show that the maximum size of a 11-cross intersecting set pair system is -- at least 5n/25^{n/2} for nn even, a=b=na=b=n, -- equal to (⌊n2⌋+1)(⌈n2⌉+1)\bigl(\lfloor\frac{n}{2}\rfloor+1\bigr)\bigl(\lceil\frac{n}{2}\rceil+1\bigr) if a=2a=2 and b=n≥4b=n\ge 4, -- at most ∣∪i=1mAi∣|\cup_{i=1}^m A_i|, -- asymptotically n2n^2 if {Ai}\{A_i\} is a linear hypergraph (∣Ai∩Aj∣≤1|A_i\cap A_j|\le 1 for i≠ji\ne j), -- asymptotically 12n2{1\over 2}n^2 if {Ai}\{A_i\} and {Bi}\{B_i\} are both linear hypergraphs

    On the Combinatorics of Projective Mappings

    Get PDF
    We consider composition sets of one-dimensional projective mappings and prove that small composition sets are closely related to Abelian subgroups
    • …
    corecore